Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, 17 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > I think that these are disadvantages of current implementation,
> > so I do refactoring unfreeze_partials().
>
> The reason the current implementation is so complex is to avoid races. The
> state of the list and the state of the partial pages must be consistent at
> all times.
>
> > Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
> > of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
> > when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.
>
> Looks good. If I can convince myself that this does not open up any
> new races then I may ack it.

This is a reminder mail.
Would u give me some comments for this please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/