Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-net: remove useless disable on freeze

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Thu May 31 2012 - 04:48:14 EST


On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:35:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 19:41:47 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:19:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > disable_cb is just an optimization: it
> > > > can not guarantee that there are no callbacks.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't yet figure out whether a callback
> > > > in freeze will trigger a bug, but disable_cb
> > > > won't address it in any case. So let's remove
> > > > the useless calls as a first step.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Looks like this isn't in the 3.5 pull request -
> > > just lost in the shuffle?
> > > disable_cb is advisory so can't be relied upon.
> >
> > I always (try to?) reply as I accept patches.
> >
> > This one did slip by, but it's harmless so no need to push AFAICT.
> >
> > Applied.
>
> This patch exists in two trees in linux-next already ... Davem's net tree
> (so presumably he will send it to Linus shortly) and Michael's vhost tree
> (is that tree needed any more?).

Yes and I dropped the patch from there, just did not push yet.

> Presumably it is now also in the rr
> tree?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/