Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>>
>>>>> s/return/Returns
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for comments!
>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
>>> So something like:
>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
>> Is the following new update patch ok?
>
>
> Any further comments for this patch? :)

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/