Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Cleanup ipi_call_lock[_irq]()/ipi_call_unlock[_irq]()

From: Srivatsa S. Bhat
Date: Tue May 29 2012 - 04:12:26 EST


On 05/29/2012 12:45 PM, Yong Zhang wrote:

> As discussed with Srivatsa [1], it seems there is no need to keep
> ipi_call_[un]lock_irq() when cpu bring-up/down. Because:
>
> 1) call_function.lock used in smp_call_function_many() is just to protect
> call_function.queue and &data->refs, cpu_online_mask is outside of the
> lock. And it's not necessary to protect cpu_online_mask,
> because data->cpumask is pre-calculate and even if a cpu is brougt up
> when calling arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), it's harmless because
> validation test in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() will take care
> of it.
>
> 2) For cpu down issue, stop_machine() will guarantee that no concurrent
> smp_call_fuction() is processing.
>
> In short it's more likely that keeping ipi_call_[un]lock() is leftover
> before we introduce generic smp helper. This patchset is just to clean
> things up.
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133766786814484&w=2
>
> Yong Zhang (10):
> hexagon: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> mn10300: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> parisc: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> S390: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> tile: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> x86: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> ia64: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock_irq()/ipi_call_unlock_irq()
> SPARC: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock_irq()/ipi_call_unlock_irq()
> POWERPC: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock()
> smp: remove ipi_call_lock[_irq]()/ipi_call_unlock[_irq]()
>


All patches except the sparc one look good.
Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/