Re: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH 5/26]Rotary Interactivity Favor SchedulerVersion 3(Brain-Eating) Update.

[Chen]

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Chen <hi3766691@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is not the regular patch!The regular one is on
> http://rifs-scheduler.googlecode.com
>
> å 2012-5-28 äå7:39ï"Heinz Diehl" <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>åéï
>
>> On 28.05.2012, Chen wrote:
>>
>> > This is the patch
>>
>> What you posted is a patch on the BFS-4.20 patch (by Con Kolivas)
>> itself, and not a patch against an actual kernel tree. The output
>> has a format which is totally unreadable and disgusting,
>> and I can't apply it without tinkering with BFS first,
>> (which is designed for 3.3.x and needs a merge into 3.4.0 on top of that)
>>
>> Could you please provide a clean patch which is based on one of the
>> current trees?
>>
>> Besides, it seems to me that you are trying to reinvent the wheel
>> using a lot of pieces of Con's -ck patch..
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Heinz.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at Âhttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at Âhttp://www.tux.org/lkml/

This is a diff between bfs and rifs actually.
Also RIFS and BFS are different scheduler.
Former one use the algorithm I 've invented(O(1) implementation ),
latter one use EEVDF(O(n) implementation)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/