Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register accessMacro to head file.

[Shubhrajyoti Datta]

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Zhang, Sonic <Sonic.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:10 PM
>>To: Zhang, Sonic
>>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML; uclinux-dist-
>>devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access
>>Macro to head file.
>>
>>Hi ,
>>On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhang, Sonic <Sonic.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:omaplinuxkernel@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 5:48 PM
>>>>To: Zhang, Sonic
>>>>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML; uclinux-dist-
>>>>devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access
>>>>Macro to head file.
>>>>
>>>>Hi ,
>>>>Some minor comments/ doubts.
>>>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM,  <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>A small description may be helpful.
>>>>Also the $SUBJECT says move the patch looks more like the remove.
>>>>Am I missing something.
>>>
>>> The subject says these definitions are moved to a head file by the other patch
>>for Blackfin architecture.
>>
>>Got it thanks.
>>
>>You may want to add a dependency otherwise it might lead to a compilation break?
>>
>
> That patch for Blackfin architecture has already been merged into mainline.
Great,

Apologies for the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/