Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

[Chen]

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Interesting posts, first the "500K scheduler" nonsense now
> printk nonsense?

printk nonsense?  You actually read my words wrong(LAUGH!)
[I m going to quota my post]
* Chen <hi3766691@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Everyone knows that this patch had been unstable. Also, too
> much code are pushed into printk() with the patch
>
I mean that too much code are brought with the patch.

500K scheduler is true. 248K(Core.c[MODULAR]) + 148K(fair.c[CFS]) +
47K(rt.c[RT])  = 443K.(Does not include the other source files of
scheduler.) It is really a *HUGE* CPU scheduler.[But it doesn't bring
much advantages to desktop!!]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/