Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] block: Generalized bio pool freeing

From: Boaz Harrosh
Date: Thu May 24 2012 - 14:07:15 EST


On 05/24/2012 08:46 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:

> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:38PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> With the old code, when you allocate a bio from a bio pool you have to
>> implement your own destructor that knows how to find the bio pool the
>> bio was originally allocated from.
>>
>> This adds a new field to struct bio (bi_pool) and changes
>> bio_alloc_bioset() to use it. This makes various bio destructors
>> unnecessary, so they're then deleted.
>>
>
> [..]
>> @@ -419,7 +406,11 @@ void bio_put(struct bio *bio)
>> */
>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bio->bi_cnt)) {
>> bio->bi_next = NULL;
>> - bio->bi_destructor(bio);
>> +
>> + if (bio->bi_pool)
>> + bio_free(bio, bio->bi_pool);
>> + else
>> + bio->bi_destructor(bio);
>
> If you have removed all the users of bi_destructor, then I am wondering that
> why are we retaining this field and trying to call into it when bio_pool
> is not set?
>


At this point there are still some users they are all removed and this field
later in the patchset

Boaz

> Thanks
> Vivek
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/