Re: [PATCH] [RFC] UBI: Implement Fastmap support

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 22:11 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> > In the error case, what are the consequences leaving the older
> on-flash
> >> > fastmap? Shouldn't it be invalidated?
> >>
> 
> After thinking a bit more about this case I think the best we can to
> is
> switching to read-only mode if ubi_update_fastmap()
> fails.
> 
Unless it fails because of -EIO, which means the PEB may become bad and
you need to pick a different one and schedule the faulty one for
torturing and marking as bad.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part