Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: ipack: fix failure registering an ipackdevice

[Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez]

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > Trying to install an ipack device it always failed in the match() function. This
> > patch fixes all the bugs present there.
> > 
> 
> This looks like part of it is undoing stuff introduced in
> [patch 1/3]?  I was going to ask what the stuff was in 1/3 and then
> it got removed which makes me wonder why even more.  Could you write
> something about why in your changelog?  Or if it's not needed then
> remove it from the first patch.
> 
> Really it would be easier to review if you broke it up into one
> patch per bug, with a description of what the bugs were instead of
> "patch fixes all the bugs present there".
> 
> Some of these changes don't seem necessary.  It feels like you were
> debugging and then when you got match() to work you just committed
> all the changes instead of only the lines which are needed.
> 

Yes, you are right. I will work again on these patches.

Thanks,

Sam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part