Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 22 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > I think that's precisely David's point: that we might want to destroy them
> > eventually.
> 
> Cannot imagine why.
> 

We can't predict how slab will be extended in the future and this affects 
anything created before g_cpucache_cpu <= EARLY.  This would introduce the 
first problem with destroying such caches and is unnecessary if a 
workaround exists.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/