Re: [PATCH 16/41] rcu: Restart the tick on non-responding adaptivenohz CPUs

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue May 22 2012 - 13:21:50 EST


On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:54:50AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When a CPU in adaptive nohz mode doesn't respond to complete
> a grace period, issue it a specific IPI so that it restarts
> the tick and chases a quiescent state.

Hello, Frederic,

I don't understand the need for this patch. If the CPU is in
adaptive-tick mode, RCU should see it as being in dyntick-idle mode,
right? If so, shouldn't RCU have already recognized the CPU as being
in an extended quiescent state?

Or is this a belt-and-suspenders situation?

Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index e141c7e..3fffc26 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/prefetch.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuset.h>
>
> #include "rcutree.h"
> #include <trace/events/rcu.h>
> @@ -302,6 +303,20 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> +static void cpuset_update_rcu_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS_NO_HZ
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> + if (cpuset_cpu_adaptive_nohz(cpu))
> + smp_cpuset_update_nohz(cpu);
> +
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If the specified CPU is offline, tell the caller that it is in
> * a quiescent state. Otherwise, whack it with a reschedule IPI.
> @@ -325,6 +340,8 @@ static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> return 1;
> }
>
> + cpuset_update_rcu_cpu(rdp->cpu);
> +
> /*
> * The CPU is online, so send it a reschedule IPI. This forces
> * it through the scheduler, and (inefficiently) also handles cases
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/