Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: Proportions with flexible period

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri May 18 2012 - 06:43:47 EST


On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 17:43 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> +void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop_global *p,
> + struct fprop_local_percpu *pl, int max_frac)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(max_frac < 100)) {
> + unsigned long numerator, denominator;
> +
> + fprop_fraction_percpu(p, pl, &numerator, &denominator);
> + if (numerator > ((long long)denominator) * max_frac / 100)
> + return;

Another thing, your fprop_fraction_percpu() can he horribly expensive
due to using _sum() (and to a lesser degree the retry), remember that
this function is called for _every_ page written out.

Esp. on the mega fast storage (multi-spindle or SSD) they're pushing cpu
limits as it is with iops, we should be very careful not to make it more
expensive than absolutely needed.

> + } else
> + fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
> + __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
> + percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/