Re: [PATCH] printk: do not flush the logbuf into console driver ininterrupt

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu May 17 2012 - 05:31:10 EST


On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:46 +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> From: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] printk: do not flush the logbuf into console driver in interrupt
>
> When irq handle tried to call printk, and it also has the chance to obtain the console sem,
> then flush the log buf to console driver,but the console driver often give several ms latency
> or more when much data in log buf existed, it will delay the irq handle.
>
> The solution is when calling the printk in interrupt, just write the chars into log buf,
> and expect other threads to flush it into console driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c index b663c2c..99959e1 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
> * the buffer. We need to hold the console semaphore
> * in order to do this test safely.
> */
> - if (!can_use_console(cpu)) {
> + if (!can_use_console(cpu) ||
> + (in_interrupt() && (!oops_in_progress))) {
> console_locked = 0;
> wake = 1;
> retval = 0;

Uhm no.. I would very much like to get my OOPSes from interrupt context
to make it out to the console.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/