Re: Perf record format portability

[Dmitry Antipov]

On 05/15/2012 07:51 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:27:39PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu:
> > Hello,
> >
> > are there any thoughts on how much of the perf.data is portable and how much it should be?
> > I'm interesting in recording scheduler activity on one machine and then replaying on
> > another. As I can see, replaying x86 perf.data on ARM doesn't work. At least, should it
> > work with a small subset of recorded events (for example, sched:sched_switch,
> > sched:sched_process_exit, sched:sched_process_fork, sched:sched_wakeup
> > and sched:sched_migrate_task) on the same architecture?
>
> Endianness issues? ARM EB? There are some patches by Jiri Olsa that may
> help you if that is the case.

Thanks, will look at.

> It should be portable, are you using 'perf archive' too?

It doesn't work with cryptic messages like:

tar: .build-id/17/d6ca02b2c31df54bf62a4142c47e3c99a9eedf: Cannot stat: No such file or directory

creating empty archive.

> What exactly is the error experienced?

Now I'm facing the simple problem with event IDs, which may be different from machine to
machine. For example, /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id is 55 on my ARM
board and 279 on my PC host, so 'perf report' displays all event names like "unknown:unknown",
even with --kallsyms=XXX where XXX is 'cat /proc/kallsyms > XXX' from PC host.

Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/