Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace percpu_ops function with this_cpu_ops

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:00:12PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> I am sorry for mess commit log previous patchset.
>>
>> As Andrew Morton's request, I combind and clean up the patchset.
>>
>> According to Ingo's complain. I use the same and short 
>> 'this_cpu_ops' functions in x86 part code.
>>
>> Thanks for all comments!
>>
>> [PATCH 1/3] net: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx or
>> [PATCH 2/3] x86: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx
>> [PATCH 3/3] percpu: remove percpu_xxx() functions
> 
> All three patches look good to me.
> 
>  Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I guess 0001 can go through net, 0002 through x86 and I can merge the
> third one once both are in mainline.  David, hpa, can you guys please
> take the respective patch?
> 

I would be happier if we kept the patchset together.

So I would greatly prefer if you'd take the whole patchset with my:

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/