[PATCH] Yama: replace capable() with ns_capable()

[Kees Cook]

When checking capabilities, the question we want to be asking is "does
current() have the capability in the child's namespace?"

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 security/yama/yama_lsm.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
index afb04cb..7ba673b 100644
--- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
+++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
@@ -264,11 +264,11 @@ static int yama_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
 		case YAMA_SCOPE_RELATIONAL:
 			if (!task_is_descendant(current, child) &&
 			    !ptracer_exception_found(current, child) &&
-			    !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
+			    !ns_capable(task_user_ns(child), CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
 				rc = -EPERM;
 			break;
 		case YAMA_SCOPE_CAPABILITY:
-			if (!capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
+			if (!ns_capable(task_user_ns(child), CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
 				rc = -EPERM;
 			break;
 		case YAMA_SCOPE_NO_ATTACH:
-- 
1.7.0.4

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/