[PATCH 2/3] mm: trivial cleanups in vmscan.c

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Mon May 14 2012 - 01:01:28 EST


Utter trivia in mm/vmscan.c, mostly just reducing the linecount slightly;
most exciting change being get_scan_count() calling vmscan_swappiness()
once instead of twice.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- 3046N.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2012-05-13 20:41:24.334117380 -0700
+++ 3046N/mm/vmscan.c 2012-05-13 20:41:51.566118170 -0700
@@ -1025,12 +1025,9 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(u
unsigned long *nr_scanned, struct scan_control *sc,
isolate_mode_t mode, enum lru_list lru)
{
- struct list_head *src;
+ struct list_head *src = &lruvec->lists[lru];
unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
unsigned long scan;
- int file = is_file_lru(lru);
-
- src = &lruvec->lists[lru];

for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty(src); scan++) {
struct page *page;
@@ -1058,11 +1055,8 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(u
}

*nr_scanned = scan;
-
- trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order,
- nr_to_scan, scan,
- nr_taken,
- mode, file);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->order, nr_to_scan, scan,
+ nr_taken, mode, is_file_lru(lru));
return nr_taken;
}

@@ -1140,8 +1134,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone
}

static noinline_for_stack void
-putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec,
- struct list_head *page_list)
+putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *page_list)
{
struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
@@ -1235,11 +1228,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
zone->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
if (current_is_kswapd())
- __count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_KSWAPD, zone,
- nr_scanned);
+ __count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_KSWAPD, zone, nr_scanned);
else
- __count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_DIRECT, zone,
- nr_scanned);
+ __count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_DIRECT, zone, nr_scanned);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);

@@ -1534,9 +1525,9 @@ static int inactive_file_is_low(struct l
return inactive_file_is_low_global(lruvec_zone(lruvec));
}

-static int inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, int file)
+static int inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
{
- if (file)
+ if (is_file_lru(lru))
return inactive_file_is_low(lruvec);
else
return inactive_anon_is_low(lruvec);
@@ -1545,10 +1536,8 @@ static int inactive_list_is_low(struct l
static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
- int file = is_file_lru(lru);
-
if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
- if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, file))
+ if (inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, lru))
shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, lru);
return 0;
}
@@ -1630,7 +1619,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec
* This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
*/
anon_prio = vmscan_swappiness(sc);
- file_prio = 200 - vmscan_swappiness(sc);
+ file_prio = 200 - anon_prio;

/*
* OK, so we have swap space and a fair amount of page cache
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/