Re: [PATCH] update i_blocks on UFS

[Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko]

On 13.05.2012 23:59, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote:

> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 03:52:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> UFS code dosn't update i_blocks which leads to the problems ranging from wrong
>> stat/du to long symlinks (as opposed to inline ones) being damaged. This is
>> a fix.
>>
> 
> Yes, when quota support was removed, code that update statistic
> about usage of blocks also was removed. But why so big change to fix this?
> I found this problem some time ago and fixed it with code bellow,
> but may be I missed something?
> 

Hm, I don't know why this code wasn't in my copy. Was it already
propagated to Linus' tree? When will it be? Which tree I should merge
from to get your latest fixes?
My code avoided counting metadata blocks (the ones holding the pointers
to actual blocks in indirect, double-indirect and triple-indirect
chains). I thought that i_blocks doesn't take into account the
metablocks but quick experiment with NetBSD image proved me wrong. So I
retract this patch altogether.
My UFS file size limit patch remains though.

-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature