[PATCH v3 6/6] remove __must_check for res_counter_charge_nofail()

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Fri May 11 2012 - 05:55:06 EST


I picked this up from Costa's slub memcg series. For fixing added warning
by patch 4.
==
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] remove __must_check for res_counter_charge_nofail()

Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there
isn't the need to use __must_check with it. It can very well
be optional.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
index d11c1cd..c6b0368 100644
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
-int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
+int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);

/*
--
1.7.4.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/