[ 19/52] regulator: Fix the logic to ensure new voltage setting in valid range

[Greg KH]

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>

commit f55205f4d4a8823a11bb8b37ef2ecbd78fb09463 upstream.

I think this is a typo.
To ensure new voltage setting won't greater than desc->max,
the equation should be desc->min + desc->step * new_val <= desc->max.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/regulator/max8997.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int max8997_set_voltage_buck(stru
 		}
 
 		new_val++;
-	} while (desc->min + desc->step + new_val <= desc->max);
+	} while (desc->min + desc->step * new_val <= desc->max);
 
 	new_idx = tmp_idx;
 	new_val = tmp_val;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/