[ 024/167] [PATCH] md: dont call ->add_disk unless there is good reason.

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

commit ed209584c38fb74b7eecc03e5b1bfe674e591bd8 upstream.

Commit 7bfec5f35c68121e7b18

   md/raid5: If there is a spare and a want_replacement device, start replacement.

cause md_check_recovery to call ->add_disk much more often.
Instead of only when the array is degraded, it is now called whenever
md_check_recovery finds anything useful to do, which includes
updating the metadata for clean<->dirty transition.
This causes unnecessary work, and causes info messages from ->add_disk
to be reported much too often.

So refine md_check_recovery to only do any actual recovery checking
(including ->add_disk) if MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED is set.

This fix is suitable for 3.3.y:

Reported-by: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/md.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index b572e1e..8beb19c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7560,14 +7560,14 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
 		 * any transients in the value of "sync_action".
 		 */
 		set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
-		clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
 		/* Clear some bits that don't mean anything, but
 		 * might be left set
 		 */
 		clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
 		clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery);
 
-		if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery))
+		if (!test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) ||
+		    test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery))
 			goto unlock;
 		/* no recovery is running.
 		 * remove any failed drives, then
-- 
1.7.10



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/