Re: [PATCH EDACv16 1/2] edac: Change internal representation to workwith layers

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em 29-04-2012 13:43, Joe Perches escreveu:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 13:20 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> The script below is even better. After that, only 113 occurrences of __func__
>> is now found at drivers/edac, and some of them are not related to debugf[1-9],
>> so they shouldn't be cover on a patch like that.
>> I'll do some manual cleanup on it.
> 
> Hi Mauro.
> 
> Another thing you could do would be to
> separate the level from the multiple macros,
> use a single macro, and convert the uses.
> 
> #define debugf(level, fmt, ...)
> and change the uses to
> debugf([0-n], "some format", args...)
> 
> I believe that's the more predominate
> kernel style for debugging macros with
> a tested level or mask.

Agreed.

> Perhaps also add !CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
> format/args checking to the debug statements.

Most/all debug-only stuff are already checking for CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG.
There are a few static debug-only data/functions that aren't testing for
it, but the compiler should remove the dead code anyway, so this shouldn't
cause any harm.

> Lastly, indenting the messages 2 tabs isn't
> really useful, one or two spaces is probably
> enough.

agreed.

> 
> I did this a bit ago so it may not apply
> after your changes:

Believe or not, it applied without troubles ;)

I've added at the end of my experimental series, at:


git://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git experimental

be careful if you use this branch, as I'm rebasing it every time I need
to change something on this series.

I'm keeping a non-rebased version, with one branch per review, at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac.git

The current review is at hw_events_v17. Patches were already pushed there.
they should be there after the usual kernel.org master/mirror replication
delay.

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/