Re: [PATCH 07/13] perf evlist: Fix creation of cpu map

From: David Ahern
Date: Fri Apr 27 2012 - 11:32:11 EST


On 4/27/12 9:08 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:16:18AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Hi,

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:22:55 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 4/26/12 3:12 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hmm.. No, I can reproduce it without any of this series. And now I think
that it is not related to the number of cpus. On my 4 core (no
hyperthreading) machine at home, the result was same.

BTW, did you change sysctl settings?

$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
0-3
$ grep . /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_*
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate:100000
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_mlock_kb:516
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid:1

$ grep . /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_*
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate:100000
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_mlock_kb:516
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid:-1

That last one is the key. I have it set to not paranoid and usually
run perf a non-root user.


That's exactly what I want to see :). On perf_mmap() we have:

if ((locked> lock_limit)&& perf_paranoid_tracepoint_raw()&&
!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}

So as long as you set perf_event_paranoid to -1 or run perf test as
root, you cannot see the failure.

Ok, after this discussion, David, can I have your acked-by or tested-by?

- Arnaldo

I had reviewed the whole series yesterday, so you can add my

Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>

to the whole series if you want. I did not pull down the set and apply to test it, and this particular patch requires prior ones so I have not tested it.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/