RE: Warning: pnp 00:0b: can't evaluate _CRS: 12311

[Moore, Robert]

> >>> [    0.294037] pnp 00:0b: can't evaluate _CRS: 12311

It sure would be nice if this error message would include the full pathname to the _CRS method. As it stands, it is rather difficult to determine just what caused this.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sedat Dilek [mailto:sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 3:27 PM
> To: Bjorn Helgaas
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Len Brown; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Moore, Robert; Lin, Ming M
> Subject: Re: Warning: pnp 00:0b: can't evaluate _CRS: 12311
> 
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Sedat Dilek
> <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ]
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> with a self-compiled linux-3.4-rc4 I am seeing this
> bugs/failures/warnings:
> >>>
> >>> [ Â Â0.241572] [Firmware Bug]: ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored
> >>>
> >>> [ Â Â0.279385] Âpci0000:00: ACPI _OSC request failed (AE_ERROR),
> >>> returned control mask: 0x1d
> >>>
> >>> [ Â Â0.293699] system 00:0a: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0c02
> >>> (active) [ Â Â0.294032] ACPI Error: Invalid/unsupported resource
> descriptor:
> >>> Type 0x00 (20120320/utresrc-650)
> >>> [ Â Â0.294037] pnp 00:0b: can't evaluate _CRS: 12311
> >>>
> >>> The same outputs I have seen also with an unsupported drm-intel-
> next
> >>> kernel from Ubuntu/PPA archives [1].
> >>>
> >>> What does ist mean? Is it harmless? Buggy firmware/bios?
> >>>
> >>> Do you need more background infos (dmesg, kernel-config, etc.)?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> - Sedat -
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-intel-
> next/current
> >>> /
> >>
> >> I have upgraded this Samsung series-5 notebook from BIOS version
> 05XK
> >> to 06XK, but the pnp/_CRS warning still remains.
> >
> > Resource type 0 is "reserved" per the ACPI spec, so this is likely a
> > BIOS defect. ÂHowever, we might be able to handle it better than we
> > currently do.
> >
> > I would expect all versions of Linux would report this error -- can
> > you confirm that or identify a version that didn't complain? ÂAlso,
> > can you collect an acpidump (see
> > http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/utilities.php)?
> >
> > In acpi_ut_validate_resource(), we return
> AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE
> > (0x3017 == 12311), which explains the messages you see. ÂThe comments
> > in acpi_ut_walk_aml_resources() suggest that we can't continue
> because
> > the length may be bogus if the type is invalid. ÂBut I suspect that
> if
> > we just treat it as a zero-length descriptor and ignore it, things
> > will probably work, and that's likely what Windows does.
> >
> > Bjorn
> 
> [ Removed Adam Belay <abelay@xxxxxxx> (email-address does not exist
> anymore) ]
> 
> Yeah, I asked today on #ubuntu-kernel and people there were very
> helpful and gave some good explanations (AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE
> etc.).
> 
> The acpidump.log I pastebin-ed today, so here it is :-).
> 
> The kernel shipped with Ubuntu/precise does not show the pnp/_CSR
> issue, this is linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic (3.2.0-23.36).
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> - Sedat -
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i