Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocolmangling

[Wolfram Sang]

> I think the assumption was that mangling requires full control of the
> bus lines, so a driver would either support all quirks (i2c-algo-bit)
> or none (everybody else), thus having a single functionality flag. As
> it seems I2C_M_NOSTART no longer fits the "quirky" category, having a
> separate flag for it would make sense. But I would leave the rest alone
> for the time being.

OK. We can still do what I proposed just in case the other mangling
features should ever become equally important ;)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature