Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE data structures.

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Apr 23 2012 - 05:49:41 EST


On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:47 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 11:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 09:14 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> +struct sched_dl_entity {
> >> + struct rb_node rb_node;
> >> + int nr_cpus_allowed;
> >
> > I think it would be all-round best to move
> > sched_rt_entity::nr_cpus_allowed out next to cpus_allowed.
>
> You mean unify them: a single nr_cpus_allowed after
> task_struct::cpus_allowed, right?

Yes, no point in keeping that one value twice and in fact there's a
usage of p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed in sched/fair.c so its past time its
moved out of that rt specific thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/