Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: skip dead but not buried clients on PipeFSevents

From: bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Apr 19 2012 - 17:40:47 EST


On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:36:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> Sorry, but ignore this patch too.
> It can't be that simple because of these cl_count tricks in rpc_release_client...

OK. Very minor whine:

>
> 19.04.2012 14:57, Stanislav Kinsbursky ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> >These clients can't be safely dereferenced if their counter in 0.
> >
> >Signee-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I don't mind fixing up trivial slips every now and then, but that double
signed-off-by seems to happen on a lot of your posts; could you figure
out what's up with your scripts?

--b.

> >
> >---
> > net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> >index 6797246..591994d 100644
> >--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> >+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> >@@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ static struct rpc_clnt *rpc_get_client_for_event(struct net *net, int event)
> > if (((event == RPC_PIPEFS_MOUNT)&& clnt->cl_dentry) ||
> > ((event == RPC_PIPEFS_UMOUNT)&& !clnt->cl_dentry))
> > continue;
> >- atomic_inc(&clnt->cl_count);
> >+ if (atomic_inc_return(&clnt->cl_count) == 1)
> >+ continue;
> > spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
> > return clnt;
> > }
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Stanislav Kinsbursky
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/