Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep sleep

[Li Yang]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We certainly don't want the policy to be against the common practice
>> of the community. ÂIf it is we can consider changing our policy.
>
> Nice, thanks for being open to discussion!
>
>> However I can't find a clear message stating the consensus of what the
>> Linux kernel community think of adding copyright claims. ÂI even found
>
> Well, what I know, the consensus is "common sense". What is obviously
> not "clear" in a way you could write it down. At least, Ben agrees.
>

We do honor your point and can be flexible on this.  I'm just not sure
if our policy need to be changed to align with the common sense of the
community.

>> some message that encourage adding copyright to maintain the GPL
>> license.
>
> I am interested. Do you have a link?

Well.  I can't find the exact message.  I remember it is from an email
discussion in which someone said by encouraging contributors to add
copyright claims to a file it would be clear that no one can change
the license of the file away from GPL.

- Leo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/