Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] rcu: v2 Inlinable preemptible rcu_read_lock()and rcu_read_unlock()

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 09:38:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This series is version two of the inlinable versions of preemptible
> > RCU's __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock().
> 
> Btw, what is this supposed to apply on top of? It doesn't seem to
> apply cleanly to either v3.3, v3.4-rc[12], or current top-of-tree.
> 
> I can make it apply by reducing the context to just one line for
> patch#6, but your base seems to be odd.

My next step is to forward-port to 4.4-rc2, retest, and expose to -next.
The base is on top of the series that was pulled into the 4.4 merge window,
but on their base on top of 3.4-rc4.

I probably should have forward-ported before submitting, but I was so
happy about it finally actually passing a moderate version of the full
set of rcutorture tests that I just couldn't restrain myself.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/