Re: ehci dynamic debug problem

From: Alan Stern
Date: Fri Apr 13 2012 - 15:40:51 EST


On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:

> > > Does it make sense now?
> >
> > No. What happens if dynamic debug is enabled for one line that calls
> > dbg_port_buf() but not for another? There's no way to avoid the string
> > formatting in both lines, even though one of them discards the result.
>
> That's why I said in my initial mail:
>
> Does dynamic debug offer an "is the message two lines below enabled" test?
>
> What I meant is that dbg_port() could test if it
> needs to call dbg_port_buf() for this call site.

Oh. As far as I know, that's not possible.

> Anyway, maybe the dbg_*_buf() are not called often enough to worry?

Probably not.

> If you're OK with "#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)"
> then maybe you should just do that?

Yes, that sounds best.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/