Re: [PATCH] x86: drop obsolete ARCH_BOOTMEM support

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Wed Apr 11 2012 - 16:54:06 EST


On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:15AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03:50AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >> From ae6cdc767f973f39cb205af4b80ff13f35a1b66e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:37:08 +0200
> > >> Subject: [PATCH] x86: drop obsolete ARCH_BOOTMEM support
> > >>
> > >> x86 unconditionally uses NO_BOOTMEM so there is no use
> > >> of the HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM support as mm/bootmem.c is the
> > >> only file referencing this symbol.
> > >>
> > >> bootmem_arch_preferred_node() is the function referred
> > >> in the mm/bootmem.c code and can thuis be dropped too.
> > >>
> > >> x86 was the sole user of HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM - so there is
> > >> an opportunity to clean up a little in mm/bootmem.c too
> > >> if we do not expect other users to emerge.
> > >
> > > avr32 seems to have it too?
> >
> > avr32 is:
> >
> > config HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM
> > def_bool n
> >
> > so that is not used with avr32
>
> Yeah, then better remove the reference from there too, right?
Yep - will do tomorrow.

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/