Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Apr 10 2012 - 04:55:08 EST


On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 11:41 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:55:58AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> > In your case I would just not use qdisc at all, like other virtual
> > devices.
>
> I think that if we do this, this also disables gso
> for the device, doesn't it?

Not at all, thats unrelated.

> If true that would be a problem as this would
> hurt performance of virtualized setups a lot.

In fact, removing qdisc layer will help a lot, removing a contention
point.

Anyway, with a 500 packet limit in TUN queue itself, qdisc layer should
be always empty. Whats the point storing more than 500 packets for a
device ? Thats a latency killer.

>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index bb8c72c..fd8c7f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > sk_filter(tun->socket.sk, skb))
> > goto drop;
> >
> > - if (skb_queue_len(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue) >= dev->tx_queue_len) {
> > + if (skb_queue_len(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue) >= TUN_READQ_SIZE) {
> > if (!(tun->flags & TUN_ONE_QUEUE)) {
> > /* Normal queueing mode. */
> > /* Packet scheduler handles dropping of further packets. */
>
> tx_queue_len is controllable by SIOCSIFTXQLEN
> so we'll need to override SIOCSIFTXQLEN somehow
> to avoid breaking userspace that actually uses SIOCSIFTXQLEN, right?

Right now, you control with this tx_queue_len both the qdisc limit (if
pfifo_fast default) and the receive_queue in TUN.

That doesnt seem right to me, and more a hack/side effect.

Maybe you want to introduce a new setting, only controling receive queue
limit, and use tx_queue_len for its original meaning.

Then, setting tx_queue_len to 0 permits to remove qdisc layer, as any
other netdevice.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/