Re: i915_driver_irq_handler: irq 42: nobody cared

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Tue Apr 10 2012 - 04:52:07 EST


On 04/06/2012 11:31 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 02:24 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:11:47 +0200, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 03/30/2012 12:45 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:59:28 +0200, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> I don't know what to dump more, because iir is obviously zero too. What
>>>>> other sources of interrupts are on the (G33) chip?
>>>>
>>>> IIR is the master interrupt, with chained secondary interrupt statuses.
>>>> If IIR is 0, the interrupt wasn't raised by the GPU.
>>>
>>> This does not make sense, the handler does something different. Even if
>>> IIR is 0, it still takes a look at pipe stats.
>>
>> That was introduced in 05eff845a28499762075d3a72e238a31f4d2407c to close
>> a race where the pipestat triggered an interrupt after we processed the
>> secondary registers and before reseting the primary.
>>
>> But the basic premise that we should only enter the interrupt handler
>> with IIR!=0 holds (presuming non-shared interrupt lines such as MSI).
>
> Ok, this behavior is definitely new. I get several "nobody cared" about
> this interrupt a week. This never used to happen. And something weird
> emerges in /proc/interrupts when this happens:
> 42: 1003292 1212890 PCI-MSI-edge ïsïïïï:0000:00:02.0
> instead of
> 42: 1006715 1218472 PCI-MSI-edge i915@pci:0000:00:02.0

See the difference of drm_device->devname:

Before:
20 34 32 3a 20 20 20 20 31 34 30 35 34 36 32 20 | 42: 1405462 |
20 20 20 31 37 32 38 33 30 32 20 20 20 50 43 49 | 1728302 PCI|
2d 4d 53 49 2d 65 64 67 65 20 20 20 20 20 20 69 |-MSI-edge i|
39 31 35 40 70 63 69 3a 30 30 30 30 3a 30 30 3a |915@pci:0000:00:|
30 32 2e 30 0a |02.0.|

After:
20 34 32 3a 20 20 20 20 31 30 30 33 32 39 32 20 | 42: 1003292 |
20 20 20 31 32 31 32 38 39 30 20 20 20 50 43 49 | 1212890 PCI|
2d 4d 53 49 2d 65 64 67 65 20 20 20 20 20 20 ef |-MSI-edge .|
bf bd 73 ef bf bd ef bf bd ef bf bd ef bf bd 3a |..s............:|
30 30 30 30 3a 30 30 3a 30 32 2e 30 0a |0000:00:02.0.|

Any idea what "ef bf bd" pattern could be? And who *shifts* the
"0000:00:02.0" string?

thanks,

--
js
suse labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/