Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Remove lumpy reclaim

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 04:52:09PM -0700, Ying Han wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Lumpy reclaim had a purpose but in the mind of some, it was to kick
> > the system so hard it trashed. For others the purpose was to complicate
> > vmscan.c. Over time it was giving softer shoes and a nicer attitude but
> > memory compaction needs to step up and replace it so this patch sends
> > lumpy reclaim to the farm.
> >
> > Here are the important notes related to the patch.
> >
> > 1. The tracepoint format changes for isolating LRU pages.
> >
> > 2. This patch stops reclaim/compaction entering sync reclaim as this
> >   was only intended for lumpy reclaim and an oversight. Page migration
> >   has its own logic for stalling on writeback pages if necessary and
> >   memory compaction is already using it. This is a behaviour change.
> >
> > 3. RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC no longer exists. pageout() does not stall
> >   on PageWriteback with CONFIG_COMPACTION has been this way for a while.
> >   I am calling it out in case this is a surpise to people.
> 
> Mel,
> 
> Can you point me the commit making that change? I am looking at
> v3.4-rc1 where set_reclaim_mode() still set RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC for
> COMPACTION_BUILD.
> 

You're right.

There is only one call site that passes sync==true for set_reclaim_mode() in
vmscan.c and that is only if should_reclaim_stall() returns true. It had the
comment "Only stall on lumpy reclaim" but the comment is not accurate
and that mislead me.

Thanks, I'll revisit the patch.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/