Re: swap on eMMC and other flash

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 09 April 2012, ìíì wrote:
> If swap system use 512KB page and issue Discard/Trim align with 512KB, eMMC make best
> performance as of today. However, large page size in swap partition may not best way
> in Linux system level.
> I'm not sure that the best page size between Swap system and eMMC device.

Can you explain the significance of the 512KB size? I've seen devices report 512KB
erase size, although measurements clearly showed an erase block size of 8MB and I
do not understand this discprepancy.

Right now, we always send discards of 1MB clusters to the device, which does what
you want, although I'm not sure if those clusters are naturally aligned to the start
of the partition. Obviously this also requires aligning the start of the partition
to the erase block size, but most devices should already get that right nowadays.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/