Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()

From: Grant Likely
Date: Sat Apr 07 2012 - 03:11:54 EST


On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:49:17 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:48:32PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > Can we make devm_gpio_request a static inline wrapper around
> > devm_gpio_request_one() with the flags field set to '0'? I don't liek
> > the duplication of this function.
>
> > Similarily, gpio_request() should actually be a static inline around
> > gpio_request_one() instead of the other way around as it is currently
> > written.
>
> Yeah, I couldn't understand why the non-managed functions were written
> in this way so I followed the same pattern when I added the managed one
> assuming that the original code was sane.

Actually, I looked at it again, and the _one version behaves subtly
different from the non-_one version. That may be irrelevant though.

g.


--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/