Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] bpf_jit drops the ball on indirectnegative mem references

[Eric Dumazet]

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:42 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:

> Do you know where i can ping the powerpc guys a little bit harder?

maybe using CC linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

One way to handle that would be to split this patch in 3 parts, so that
I can Ack the non ppc part.

[1] introduce bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper()
	[BTW no need to EXPORT_SYMBOL it, since jit is not a module ]

[2] x86_bpf_iit: handle negative offsets in loads

[3] ppc_bpf_jit: handle negative offsets in loads



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/