Re: [PATCH 03/15] perf: Unified API to record selective sets of archregisters

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:35:46PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
...
> +static inline u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> +{
> +	switch (idx) {
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RAX:
> +		return regs->ax;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RBX:
> +		return regs->bx;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RCX:
> +		return regs->cx;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RDX:
> +		return regs->dx;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RSI:
> +		return regs->si;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_RDI:
> +		return regs->di;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R8:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R9:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R10:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R11:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R12:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R13:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R14:
> +		return regs->r8;
> +	case PERF_X86_64_REG_R15:
> +		return regs->r8;

I guess there are too much r8's :-)

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/