Re: [PATCH 11/39] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I am most certainly not going to fix your mess as I completely disagree
> with the approach taken.

This is _purely_ a performance optimization so if my design is so bad,
and you're also requiring all apps that spans over more than one NUMA
node to be modified to use your new syscalls, you won't have problems
to win against AutoNUMA in the benchmarks.

At the moment I can't believe your design has a chance to compete.

But please proof me wrong with the numbers, and I won't be stubborn
and I'll rm -r autonuma and (if you let me), I'll be happy to contribute
to your code.

> You're in fact very unclear. You post patches without the RFC tag,

Subject: [PATCH 00/39] [RFC] AutoNUMA alpha10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/