Re: [PATCH 07/39] autonuma: introduce kthread_bind_node()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 17:22 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I don't see what's wrong with more than 1 CPU in the hard bind
> cpumask.

Because its currently broken, but we're trying to restore its pure
semantic so that we can use it in more places again, like
debug_smp_processor_id(). Testing a single process flag is _much_
cheaper than testing ->cpus_allowed.

Adding more broken isn't an option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/