Re: CPU Hotplug rework

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 09:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:11 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Obviously, having callbacks hanging around until the CPU comes back is
> > > not viable, nor is blocking preempt during the callbacks.  Calling
> > > get_online_cpus() is too heavy. 
> > 
> > -rt has patches (albeit somewhat ugly) to make get_online_cpus() a br
> > style rw-lock. 
> 
> Unfortunately, -rt still has broken cpu hotplug.

This is still the issue where we take the hotplug lock for write, but
then rely on other threads to complete -- say CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers
doing flush_workqueue(), and the worker kthread needing to acquire the
hotplug lock for read, right?

Yes, that is bothersome, but doesn't hinder the work required to get
get_online_cpus() usably fast, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/