RE: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Xen pad logic

[Liu, Jinsong]

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> +static struct acpi_driver xen_acpi_pad_driver = {
>> +	.name = "processor_aggregator",
>> +	.class = ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS,
>> +	.ids = xen_pad_device_ids,
>> +	.ops = {
>> +		.add = xen_acpi_pad_add,
>> +		.remove = xen_acpi_pad_remove,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init xen_acpi_pad_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return acpi_bus_register_driver(&xen_acpi_pad_driver);
> 
> If the acpi_bus_register_driver function could work with multiple
> acpi_drivers that define the same class (and have some priority) would
> this be easier?

Not quite clear your point, could you elaborate more?

Thanks,
Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/