[PATCH] x86_fixup_irqs: Fix possible missing interrupt handle whendisabling CPU

[Liu, Chuansheng]

From: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] x86_fixup_irqs: Fix possible missing interrupt handle when disabling CPU

When preparing to unmask the irq in fixup_irqs(), using irqd_irq_masked()
as the condition to determine if do real unmasking action or not.

Because in some chips, the .irq_disable is NULL, so calling disable_irq()
does not mean the irq is masked immediately, and before enable_irq() if
the irq is coming, it can be pending state. Using irqd_irq_disabled() will
lose this chance.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 6c0802e..b9dd37f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
                        set_affinity = 0;
 
                if (!irqd_can_move_in_process_context(data) &&
-                   !irqd_irq_disabled(data) && chip->irq_unmask)
+                   !irqd_irq_masked(data) && chip->irq_unmask)
                        chip->irq_unmask(data);
 
                raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
-- 
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/