Re: [patch -next 1/2] drivers, samsung-laptop: fix initializationof sabi_data in sabi_set_commandb

From: David Rientjes
Date: Mon Mar 19 2012 - 18:49:41 EST


On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Corentin Chary wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:59 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Fields d0, d1, d2, and d3 are members of an anonymous struct inside an
> > anonymous union inside struct sabi_data. ÂInitialization must be done by
> > wrapping the anonymous union and structs with brackets to avoid a build
> > error:
> >
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c: In function âsabi_set_commandbâ:
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: error: unknown field âd0â specified in initializer
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: warning: missing braces around initializer
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: warning: (near initialization for âin.<anonymous>â)
> > ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Âdrivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c | Â Â2 +-
> > Â1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ exit:
> > Âstatic int sabi_set_commandb(struct samsung_laptop *samsung,
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â u16 command, u8 data)
> > Â{
> > - Â Â Â struct sabi_data in = { .d0 = 0, .d1 = 0, .d2 = 0, .d3 = 0 };
> > + Â Â Â struct sabi_data in = { { { .d0 = 0, .d1 = 0, .d2 = 0, .d3 = 0 } } };
> >
> > Â Â Â Âin.data[0] = data;
> > Â Â Â Âreturn sabi_command(samsung, command, &in, NULL);
>
>
> Acked-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> David, just in case, I found this mail in my spam folder, probably
> because your smtp server is not allowed to send @google.com mails.
>
> Also, with which version of gcc is this necessary ? Old version worked
> with 4.5 and 4.6.
>
> Matthew, could you merge that one and the other directly in your tree ? Thanks

Matthew, this is still missing from linux-next as of today's tree. Ping
on this?