Re: [PATCHv2 3/5] cpuidle: add support for states that affect multiplecpus

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Thu Mar 15 2012 - 21:52:44 EST


On 3/15/2012 5:20 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> Oops, dropped the atomic_dec when I merged from two separate functions
> for up and down to a single function that takes a bool.

generally in Linux we tend to not like "multiplexer" common functions
like this.

my suggestion: make your current function a __ prefixed one, then
provide 2 small inlines that call the __ one...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/