Re: [PATCH 0/4] radix-tree: iterating general cleanup

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Mar 14 2012 - 20:06:16 EST


On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:49:21AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > >Any updates on this series?

Linus took an interest, so I went to sleep. It seems that a role
reversal is in order ;)

> > > I had sent "[PATCH v2 0/3] radix-tree: general iterator" February 10, there is no more updates after that.
> > > I just checked v2 on top "next-20120314" -- looks like all ok.
> >
> > this was more a question to the MM maintainers if this is getting
> > merged or if there were any further comments.
>
> I haven't studied the code at all - I'm afraid Konstantin is rather
> more productive than I can keep up with, and other bugs and patches
> appeared to be more urgent and important.

I'll take a look.

> And I made a patch for the
> radix-tree test harness which akpm curates, to update its radix-tree.c
> to Konstantin's: those tests ran perfectly on 64-bit and on 32-bit.
> That patch to rtth appended below.

Thanks.

> (I do have, or expect to have once I study them, reservations about
> his subsequent changes to radix-tree usage in mm/shmem.c; and even
> if I end up agreeing with his changes, would prefer to hold them off
> until after the tmpfs fallocation mods are in - other work which
> had to yield to higher priorities, ready but not yet commented.)

OK, I shall forget all about that followup series this time around.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/