Re: [PATCH 4/5] max17042: Fix value scaling for VCELL and avgVCELL

From: bruce robertson
Date: Tue Mar 13 2012 - 17:00:15 EST


Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:26:07AM -0800, dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Bruce Robertson <bruce.e.robertson@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The bottom three bits of the register are don't care bits. The LSB
>> value is 625 uV. Adjust the returned values appropriately
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Robertson <bruce.e.robertson@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I guess this was fixed long ago by the following patch:
>
> commit cf7a8c03db792894f436db5f3ffc44d947b9b068
> Author: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Aug 17 10:18:34 2011 +0900
>
> max17042_battery: Bugfix of incorrect voltage register value interpretation
>
> The calculation had error in getting voltage values from
> MAX17042 registers. The least bit denotes 78.125uV (625/8).

The multipliers I see in the patch are 83 making the voltages somewhat
high and the low 3 bits are not masked off. I'm probably misreading the code.

>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/