Re: linux-next: manual merge of the isci tree with the scsi tree

From: Williams, Dan J
Date: Mon Mar 12 2012 - 22:50:35 EST


On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the isci tree produced a large number of
> conflicts against the scsi.
>
>  Merging isci/all
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/scsi/sas_ata.h
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/scsi/libsas.h
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/linux/libata.h
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/request.h
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/registers.h
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/port.h
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/port.c
> +CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/phy.c
>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
>
> Since you are feeding patches into the scsi tree (instaed of having you
> tree merged into the scsi tree), you should rebase your tree in the scsi
> tree after your patches have been accepted.  The above conflicts are
> (almost completely) caused by having the same patches in both trees with
> additional changes to those files in your tree.

I was wondering why it had not happened prior to this point... in any
event I'll get my tree rebased on top scsi-misc so that isci.git#all
will just be the pending delta.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/