Re: TTY: tty_port questions

From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Mon Mar 12 2012 - 07:15:43 EST


On 12.03.2012 11:53, Alan Cox wrote:
Another question, what is the purpose of tty_port->console?
It seems to have no user.

So the tty_port layer can in future know about whether it is a console
without a tty necessarily being present or referenceable.

Is tty_port really the right thing for a console driver like in the UML
case?

It will be. In order to fix the tty locking mess we need to shove a lot
of stuff whose lifetime is the lifetime of the physical port somewhere
else - the tty_port is that structure.


"It will be" in terms of "not now"? ;-)

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/